LOL! I FKN TOLD YOU SO! This plus seven bucks buys me coffee at starbucks.
I wrote this critique/response to a Interval Research Corp 1992..1994 "Online Communities Mini-Conference", I scanned and posted the preliminary minutes some time ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_Research_Corporation
It was a nothing for me.... While looking for something else, as is always the way, I found this old critique/response. It appears that I had responded them after the fact as presumably expected, but wrote this additional critique I likely did not share with Interval.
But it's the real one.
Well we've certainly got our Ghost of Christmas Future moment now.
Document timestamp lost, but it's from a folder I dated "1994", so it's 92 to 94 likely.
I was never popular with this crowd; it was soooo obvious that under nearly every single utterance about building culture, was fundamentally just about profit. I mean duh.
(It could have used an edit pass.)
--------------
This is the not-for-public-viewing addendum. It's arrogant and presumptious, especially coming on the heels of my previous rant (polemic is a nicer word :-)
To be brutally honest, I didn't get very inspired by what I heard people say, socially and ethics-interestedly speaking. With a few exceptions, I didn't connect with anyone signifigantly, nor feel like my goals were very compatible (since they generally (sigh) don't involve anything that makes money, not that I don't want to make money!). Actually I was a bit dismayed, in that those in fact making decisions to launch systems of wide and deep social impact aren't very savvy at all about the ramifications of just what the hell they're doing. But not surprised.
Besides people I already knew or knew of (Lee Felsenstein, Howard Rheingold, Dave Hughes, Doug Engelbart, Anna Couey, Cliff Figallo, well people, etc) it seems the people I got along with best were Interval people! I still haven't yet got to talk with Brenda Laurel.
part 1 of 2 or maybe 3 we'll see